Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 16 S
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 16 S (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 29/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 16 S has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 177,554); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 S doesn't; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Camon 16 S
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 723
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 38/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 16 S better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 16 S, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 47 points higher (76/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (94/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (57/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (68/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon 16 S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 723 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10, HIOS 6.2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.5×76.5×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 16 S
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Camon 16 S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 16 S by 1568.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 16 S
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (91/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (94/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (57/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (68/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 16 S?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S by 47 points (76/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 16 S?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Camon 16 S — 29/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 16 S?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 16 S?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 16 S?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.