Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra. Both devices score the same overall rating of 66/100. Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4000); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,112,047 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Redmi Turbo 5
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1923 vs 1555
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 204g
- Better camera (58/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2112047 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 75/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 received the same MobileRank rating — 66/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra are nearly equal (77/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (75/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 2112047 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 6405 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | $250 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 14.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra are nearly equal (77/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (58/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (75/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Redmi Turbo 5?
Both devices scored 66/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi Turbo 5 (77/100 vs 75/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.