Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; launch prices were $1499 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 66/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,112,047).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Redmi Turbo 5
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2112047
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1499
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 12 points higher (78/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (60/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 2112047 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 6405 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 60.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1249. Redmi Turbo 5 was $1249 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (60/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.