Motorola Moto G71 5G vs Nokia XR30

The Motorola Moto G71 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G71 5G leads — 49/100 vs 46/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G71 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.

The Motorola Moto G71 5G edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G71 5G

Performance 46
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 45
Portability 66
Value for money —

Nokia XR30

Performance 46
Display 66
Camera 43
Battery 37
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Moto G71 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh

  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)

What makes Nokia XR30 better?

  • Faster charging: 33W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (43/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G71 5G vs the Nokia XR30, the Motorola Moto G71 5G scores 3 points higher (49/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G71 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G71 5G is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G71 5G Nokia XR30
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
AnTuTu 592015 592015
Geekbench Single 905 905
Geekbench Multi 2101 2101
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.7"
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2400
Refresh rate — —
Battery 5000 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 30W 33W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 6GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 11 Android 13
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 161.2×73.9×8.5 mm —
Weight 179 g —
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G71 5G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Nokia XR30

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G71 5G

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
84
display

Nokia XR30

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
66
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G71 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery

Nokia XR30

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G71 5G and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G71 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
49/100
592015 AnTuTu
Nokia XR30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
46/100
592015 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G71 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (84/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G71 5G is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G71 5G or the Nokia XR30?

The Motorola Moto G71 5G edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G71 5G and the Nokia XR30?

The Motorola Moto G71 5G has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G71 5G or the Nokia XR30?

The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G71 5G over the Nokia XR30?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Motorola Moto G71 5G (84/100 vs 66/100).