Motorola Moto G67 Power vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Motorola Moto G67 Power (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 52/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G67 Power has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 798,429); the Motorola Moto G67 Power is noticeably lighter (210g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 31 points (83/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G67 Power

Performance 53
Display 66
Camera 40
Battery 57
Portability 47
Value for money 64

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Motorola Moto G67 Power better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 210g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $1799

  • Overall rating 52/100

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 798429
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2687
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 47/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G67 Power vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 31 points higher (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G67 Power — 64/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G67 Power Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 798429 3057215
Geekbench Single 1015 2833
Geekbench Multi 2687 9119
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W 68W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IPX9
Dimensions 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 210 g 285 g
Launch price $200 $1799

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G67 Power and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G67 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
52/100
798429 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +73.9%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Motorola Moto G67 Power by 73.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G67 Power

$200

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $1599. Motorola Moto G67 Power was $1599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (90/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (91/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 31 points (83/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Moto G67 Power has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G67 Power over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.