Motorola Moto G17 vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Motorola Moto G17 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $198 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 23/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G17 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 358,383); the Motorola Razr Fold is thinner (4.7mm vs 8.2mm).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 by 54 points (77/100 vs 23/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G17
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 36
Battery 42
Design 50
Value for money 96
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Motorola Moto G17 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper: $198 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (96/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 18W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 36/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G17 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 54 points higher (77/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G17 leads (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (96/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Moto G17: The Motorola Moto G17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G17 Motorola Razr Fold
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 358383 3942923
Geekbench Single 432 3640
Geekbench Multi 1416 11033
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 68W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IPX9
Dimensions 165.7×76.0×8.2 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 285 g
Price $198 $1799
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G17
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 32MP
36
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G17
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G17
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G17 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G17 MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme
23/100
358383 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100 +90.9%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Motorola Moto G17 by 90.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G17
$198
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Price difference: $1601. Motorola Moto G17 is cheaper by $1601.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (91/100 vs 36/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (50/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (96/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 by 54 points (77/100 vs 23/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G17 and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Moto G17 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 36/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G17 over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Moto G17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.