Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $499 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 70/100 vs 57/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5200); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,708,482 vs 894,500); the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 219g).

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026
Performance 56
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 66
Portability 61
Value for money 40
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Performance 87
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 82
What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 better?
  • Lighter: 192g vs 219g

  • Better camera (42/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (61/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2708482 vs 894500
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2920
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $499

  • Higher performance (87/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 13 points higher (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 — 40/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (61/100 vs 45/100).

Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026: The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 is a better fit for everyday use.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 894500 2708482
Geekbench Single 1015 2680
Geekbench Multi 2920 8358
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 9000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 8 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.2×74.8×8.3 mm 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 192 g 219 g
Launch price $499 $300
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
66
battery
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
57/100
894500 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
70/100 +67.0%
2708482 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 by 67.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026
$499
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
$300

Launch price difference: $199. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $199 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 (87/100 vs 56/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (61/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 leads on camera score (42/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (87/100 vs 56/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2026 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.