Motorola Moto G Fast vs Redmi Note 8T
The Motorola Moto G Fast (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Redmi Note 8T (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 8T leads — 16/100 vs 8/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 48 MP; the Redmi Note 8T has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G Fast doesn't.
Motorola Moto G Fast
Redmi Note 8T
- Lighter: 189g vs 190g
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 62/100)
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (25/100 vs 5/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G Fast vs the Redmi Note 8T, the Redmi Note 8T scores 8 points higher (16/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 8T leads (25/100 vs 5/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 8T notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (25/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 12/100. In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Redmi Note 8T are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G Fast | Redmi Note 8T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.3" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×75.7×9.1 mm | 161.1×75.4×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | $200 |
Motorola Moto G Fast
- Main: 16MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Note 8T
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Note 8T
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 8T
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto G Fast and Redmi Note 8T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Motorola Moto G Fast
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 8T notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (25/100 vs 5/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 12/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Redmi Note 8T are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Redmi Note 8T edges out the Motorola Moto G Fast by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a MobileRank rating of 8/100, the Redmi Note 8T — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Redmi Note 8T leads on camera score (25/100 vs 5/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Fast over the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G Fast is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 8T is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.