Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $349 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 62/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,129,182); the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ is noticeably lighter (177g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ by 20 points (82/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+

Performance 61
Display 94
Camera 46
Battery 58
Portability 81
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ better?

  • Lighter: 177g vs 216g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $499

  • Better portability (81/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1129182
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3168
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 20 points higher (82/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (97/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (65/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (75/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (81/100 vs 44/100).

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+: The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1129182 4704310
Geekbench Single 1223 3293
Geekbench Multi 3168 10243
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1272x2772 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×75.6×7.2 mm —
Weight 177 g 216 g
Launch price $349 $499

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
46
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
62/100
1129182 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +76.0%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+

$349

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $150. Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ was $150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (97/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (65/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ (75/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (81/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ by 20 points (82/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.