Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Tecno Pova Slim

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400; launch prices were $699 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads — 89/100 vs 52/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 198g).

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 37 points (89/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 98
Display 84
Camera 90
Battery 84
Portability 61
Value for money 92

Tecno Pova Slim

Performance 45
Display 93
Camera 31
Battery 51
Portability 100
Value for money 58

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 581041
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 803
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5160 mAh
  • Faster charging: 125W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 156g vs 198g
  • Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $699

  • Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 37 points higher (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (98/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (90/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (84/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 92/100, Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (98/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (90/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (100/100 vs 61/100).

Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Pro Tecno Pova Slim
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 6400
AnTuTu 3950082 581041
Geekbench Single 3639 803
Geekbench Multi 11047 2047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2780x1264 1224x2720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 125W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC — yes
Protection — IP64
Dimensions — 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm
Weight 198 g 156 g
Launch price $699 $230

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Tecno Pova Slim

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Tecno Pova Slim

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 125W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Tecno Pova Slim

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Tecno Pova Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3950082 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Slim MediaTek Dimensity 6400
52/100 -579.8%
581041 AnTuTu

Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads Tecno Pova Slim by 579.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$699

Tecno Pova Slim

$230

Launch price difference: $469. Tecno Pova Slim was $469 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (98/100 vs 45/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (90/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (84/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (100/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 37 points (89/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 52/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on camera score (90/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 45/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Pro over the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.