Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads — 89/100 vs 76/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 229g).

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 98
Display 84
Camera 90
Battery 84
Portability 61
Value for money 92

Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

Performance 75
Display 99
Camera 81
Battery 66
Portability 27
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1797821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 198g vs 229g

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (61/100 vs 27/100)

What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz

  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 13 points higher (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (61/100 vs 27/100).

Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro: The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Pro Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3950082 1797821
Geekbench Single 3639 1923
Geekbench Multi 11047 5179
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
Resolution 2780x1264 1440x3120
Refresh rate 120 Hz 240 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 125W —
Wireless charging 50W —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 14
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions — 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm
Weight 198 g 229 g
Launch price $699 —

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

  • 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3120
  • Refresh rate: 240 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 125W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3950082 AnTuTu
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
76/100 -119.7%
1797821 AnTuTu

Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 119.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$699

Sharp Aquos R9 Pro

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (61/100 vs 27/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on camera score (90/100 vs 81/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Pro over the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.