Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7030, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $316 and $153. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads — 38/100 vs 26/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter (170g vs 190g).

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 44
Battery 48
Design 87
Value for money 88
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 28
Battery 37
Design 62
Value for money 99
What makes Motorola Edge 40 Neo better?
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 170g vs 190g

  • Better camera (44/100 vs 28/100)
  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 62/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 4G better?
  • Cheaper: $153 vs $316

  • Better value for money (99/100 vs 88/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo scores 12 points higher (38/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (44/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (44/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (87/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Edge 40 Neo Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7030 MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 548631
Geekbench Single 760
Geekbench Multi 1890
Display 6.5" P-OLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 103
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP54
Dimensions 159.6×72.0×7.9 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 170 g 190 g
Price $316 $153
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
44
camera
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • 6.5" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
$316
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
$153

Price difference: $163. Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is cheaper by $163.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (44/100 vs 28/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (87/100 vs 62/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 26/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads on camera score (44/100 vs 28/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.