Motorola Moto G55 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
The Motorola Moto G55 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $261 and $153. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G55 leads — 34/100 vs 26/100 (a 8-point difference).
Motorola Moto G55
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 179g vs 190g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 62/100)
- Cheaper: $153 vs $261
- Better value for money (99/100 vs 92/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G55 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Motorola Moto G55 scores 8 points higher (34/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G55 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G55 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G55 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G55 | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 548631 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.1 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $261 | $153 |
Motorola Moto G55
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Moto G55
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Moto G55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $108. Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is cheaper by $108.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G55 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G55 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G55 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Moto G55 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G55 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Moto G55 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 26/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G55 over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Motorola Moto G55 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.