Meizu Note 16 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 44/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Note 16 has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.2mm).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16
Performance 40
Display 66
Camera 30
Battery 57
Portability 36
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Meizu Note 16 better?
  • Bigger battery: 6600 vs 6510 mAh
  • Lighter: 217g vs 226g

  • Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2200
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (87/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).

Meizu Note 16: The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Meizu Note 16 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Unisoc T8200 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3258010
Geekbench Single 750 3228
Geekbench Multi 2200 9553
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2460 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6600 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 40W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 217 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16
  • 6600 mAh
  • Wired: 40W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Note 16
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (93/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (84/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (81/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.