Meizu Note 16 vs Poco F7
The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 66/100 vs 44/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Note 16 has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 6500); the Poco F7 is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Meizu Note 16
Poco F7
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 6500 mAh
- Overall rating 44/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 2200
- Faster charging: 90W vs 40W
- Lighter: 215g vs 217g
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 22 points higher (66/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2205378 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $399 |
Meizu Note 16
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Meizu Note 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Meizu Note 16
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Meizu Note 16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (81/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (83/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 22 points (66/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Poco F7?
The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (81/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Poco F7?
The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.