Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Poco F7
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 66/100 vs 58/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6200); the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,378 vs 1,040,961); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 215g).
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Poco F7
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 215g
- Better display (93/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2205378 vs 1040961
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 3315
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 8 points higher (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1040961 | 2205378 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1162 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3315 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $399 |
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 52.8% in our overall performance rating.
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 edges out the Meizu Note 16 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Poco F7?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (81/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Poco F7?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.