Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Poco F9 Ultra
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Poco F9 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Ultra leads — 90/100 vs 58/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Ultra has the bigger battery (8050 mAh vs 6200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,165,108 vs 1,041,899); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 238g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Poco F9 Ultra
What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?
- Lighter: 198g vs 238g
- Better display (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Poco F9 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4165108 vs 1041899
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 8050 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Poco F9 Ultra, the Poco F9 Ultra scores 32 points higher (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Poco F9 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (55/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Poco F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041899 | 4165108 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 8050 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 163.5×78.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 238 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco F9 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F9 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F9 Ultra
- 8050 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Poco F9 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Ultra leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 75.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (98/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Poco F9 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (90/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (91/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (55/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro by 32 points (90/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Poco F9 Ultra — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F9 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.