Meizu Note 16 vs Poco F8
The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Poco F8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 leads — 75/100 vs 44/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6600).
Meizu Note 16
Poco F8
- Overall rating 44/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2200
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 217g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Poco F8, the Poco F8 scores 31 points higher (75/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 leads (92/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (92/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (54/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 | Poco F8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 217 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Meizu Note 16
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco F8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Meizu Note 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8
- 6.6" OLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Meizu Note 16
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Poco F8
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
Meizu Note 16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (92/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (90/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (86/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (54/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 31 points (75/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Poco F8?
The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Poco F8 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 leads on performance (92/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Poco F8?
The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F8 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.