Lava Storm Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Lava Storm Lite (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $89 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 43/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 581,041); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Storm Lite doesn't; the Lava Storm Lite is noticeably lighter (196g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Storm Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Lava Storm Lite better?
- Lighter: 196g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $89 vs $950
- Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Storm Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 48 points higher (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Storm Lite — 80/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (99/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Storm Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×78.1×8.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $89 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Lava Storm Lite
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Storm Lite
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Storm Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Storm Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Lava Storm Lite by 86.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $861. Lava Storm Lite was $861 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (99/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Storm Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Lite by 48 points (91/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Storm Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Lava Storm Lite has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Storm Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Storm Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Lava Storm Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Lava Storm Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.