Lava Shark 2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Lava Shark 2 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 36/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Shark 2 doesn't; the Lava Shark 2 is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Shark 2

Performance 40
Display 55
Camera 10
Battery 51
Portability 44
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Lava Shark 2 better?

  • Lighter: 210g vs 230g

  • Better portability (44/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2200
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Shark 2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Shark 2 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Shark 2 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Unisoc T8200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu — 4247433
Geekbench Single 750 3639
Geekbench Multi 2200 11047
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1612 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 165.9×76.8×8.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 210 g 230 g
Launch price — $950

Camera comparison

Lava Shark 2

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Lava Shark 2

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Lava Shark 2

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Shark 2

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (99/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (89/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 (85/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Shark 2 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Shark 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Shark 2 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Shark 2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Lava Shark 2 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Shark 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Shark 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Lava Shark 2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.