Lava O2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Lava O2 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T616, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 31/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava O2 doesn't; the Lava O2 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 by 60 points (91/100 vs 31/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava O2

Performance 19
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 52
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Lava O2 better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 230g

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 400
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1350
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava O2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 60 points higher (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava O2 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava O2 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Unisoc T616 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu — 4247433
Geekbench Single 400 3639
Geekbench Multi 1350 11047
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection — IP69
Dimensions 165.0×76.1×8.7 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 200 g 230 g
Launch price — $950

Camera comparison

Lava O2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Lava O2

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Lava O2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava O2

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (99/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (89/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava O2 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava O2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava O2 by 60 points (91/100 vs 31/100).

What is the rating of the Lava O2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Lava O2 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava O2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava O2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 19/100).

Should you choose the Lava O2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.