Lava Blaze Dragon vs TCL 605

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the TCL 605 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81; launch prices were $109 and $169. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Dragon leads — 42/100 vs 36/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 605 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Dragon is faster in AnTuTu (568,395 vs 358,608); the TCL 605 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the TCL 605 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 210g).

The Lava Blaze Dragon edges out the TCL 605 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

TCL 605

Performance 30
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 48
Portability 62
Value for money 42

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 568395 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2115 vs 1416
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $169

  • Higher performance (46/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (56/100 vs 43/100)

What makes TCL 605 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 190g vs 210g

  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (62/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the TCL 605, the Lava Blaze Dragon scores 6 points higher (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon leads (46/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, TCL 605 — 42/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the TCL 605 (46/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the TCL 605 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the TCL 605 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (62/100 vs 41/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon TCL 605
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 MediaTek Helio G81
AnTuTu 568395 358608
Geekbench Single 915 432
Geekbench Multi 2115 1416
Display 6.8" LCD 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 900x1600 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 18W 18W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 4GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 450 nits 480 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP54
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm 165.6×76.2×8.3 mm
Weight 210 g 190 g
Launch price $109 $169

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

TCL 605

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

TCL 605

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

TCL 605

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and TCL 605, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
TCL 605 MediaTek Helio G81
36/100 -58.5%
358608 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Dragon leads TCL 605 by 58.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

TCL 605

$169

Launch price difference: $60. Lava Blaze Dragon was $60 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the TCL 605 (46/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the TCL 605 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the TCL 605 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (62/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the TCL 605?

The Lava Blaze Dragon edges out the TCL 605 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the TCL 605?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the TCL 605 — 36/100.

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the TCL 605?

The Lava Blaze Dragon leads on performance (46/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the TCL 605?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the TCL 605 (62/100 vs 41/100).