Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs TCL 605
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the TCL 605 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81; launch prices were $139 and $169. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 36/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 605 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 358,608); the TCL 605 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 190g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
TCL 605
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 190g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $169
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 62/100)
What makes TCL 605 better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the TCL 605, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 14 points higher (50/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, TCL 605 — 42/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 605 (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 605 (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the TCL 605 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 605 (79/100 vs 62/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | TCL 605 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 165.6×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $169 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
TCL 605
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
TCL 605
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
TCL 605
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and TCL 605, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads TCL 605 by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $30. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $30 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 605 (51/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 605 (79/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the TCL 605 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 605 (79/100 vs 62/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 605?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the TCL 605 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 605?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the TCL 605 — 36/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 605?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the TCL 605?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.