Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $139 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads — 57/100 vs 50/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is faster in AnTuTu (953,150 vs 693,978); the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $449
- Better display (79/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 47/100)
What makes TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 953150 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (57/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (61/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER scores 7 points higher (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads (61/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (79/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (79/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 850 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $449 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
- 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 27.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $310. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $310 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (79/100 vs 63/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (61/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (79/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?
The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER edges out the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?
The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads on camera score (61/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?
The TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER leads on performance (57/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.