Lava Blaze Dragon vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $109 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G leads — 48/100 vs 42/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is faster in AnTuTu (603,772 vs 568,395); the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is noticeably lighter (192g vs 210g).

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G edges out the Lava Blaze Dragon by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

Performance 46
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money 66

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2115 vs 1826
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $166

  • Overall rating 42/100

What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 603772 vs 568395
  • Better Geekbench Single: 960 vs 915
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 192g vs 210g

  • Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (67/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G scores 6 points higher (48/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (67/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Lava Blaze Dragon are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (68/100 vs 41/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 568395 603772
Geekbench Single 915 960
Geekbench Multi 2115 1826
Display 6.8" LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 900x1600 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 8 MP 13 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 450 nits —
NFC no —
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm —
Weight 210 g 192 g
Launch price $109 $166

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 +5.9%
603772 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 5.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

$166

Launch price difference: $57. Lava Blaze Dragon was $57 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (67/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Lava Blaze Dragon are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (68/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G edges out the Lava Blaze Dragon by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (68/100 vs 41/100).