Honor Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $215 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Turbo leads — 58/100 vs 48/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 5000); the Honor Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (1,000,207 vs 603,772).

The Honor Turbo is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Turbo

Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 34
Battery 74
Portability 64
Value for money 74

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

Performance 46
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money 66

What makes Honor Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1000207 vs 603772
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1087 vs 960
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3148 vs 1826
  • Bigger battery: 8560 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (58/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (34/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (82/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 5G better?

  • Lighter: 192g vs 196g
  • Cheaper at launch: $166 vs $215

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Honor Turbo scores 10 points higher (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo leads (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo leads (74/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Honor Turbo — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (82/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Honor Turbo are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Turbo Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 1000207 603772
Geekbench Single 1087 960
Geekbench Multi 3148 1826
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1200x2640 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 8560 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 5 MP
Front camera 16 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP68/IP69 —
Dimensions 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm —
Weight 196 g 192 g
Launch price $215 $166

Camera comparison

Honor Turbo

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Honor Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Honor Turbo

  • 8560 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Turbo and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
58/100
1000207 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 -65.7%
603772 AnTuTu

Honor Turbo leads Samsung Galaxy A17 5G by 65.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Turbo

$215

Samsung Galaxy A17 5G

$166

Launch price difference: $49. Samsung Galaxy A17 5G was $49 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (82/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (74/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Honor Turbo are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Honor Turbo is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.

Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

The Honor Turbo leads on performance (58/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Honor Turbo (74/100 vs 52/100).