Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo Y500 (China)
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo Y500 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300; launch prices were $139 and $185. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y500 (China) leads — 55/100 vs 50/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 (China) has the bigger battery (8200 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo Y500 (China) is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 693,978); the Vivo Y500 (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 213g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo Y500 (China)
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 1011
- Lighter: 174g vs 213g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $185
- Better portability (79/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo Y500 (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2813 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 8200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Higher performance (55/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo Y500 (China), the Vivo Y500 (China) scores 5 points higher (55/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) leads (74/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo Y500 (China) — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (74/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (79/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo Y500 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.1×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 213 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $185 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y500 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 8200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo Y500 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y500 (China) leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $46. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $46 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (74/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (79/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Vivo Y500 (China) edges out the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo Y500 (China) — 55/100.
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.