Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $139 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 50/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 693,978); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $280
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 21 points higher (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (88/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (73/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 75.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $141. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $141 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (88/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (73/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21 points (71/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.