Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs TCL 60R

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the TCL 60R (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $139 and $109. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 43/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 60R has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 528,398); the TCL 60R has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 190g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the TCL 60R by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

TCL 60R

Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 48
Portability 63
Value for money 72

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
  • Lighter: 174g vs 190g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 63/100)

What makes TCL 60R better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $139

  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the TCL 60R, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 7 points higher (50/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, TCL 60R — 72/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60R (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the TCL 60R and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60R (79/100 vs 63/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 TCL 60R
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 693978 528398
Geekbench Single 1037 771
Geekbench Multi 2386 1980
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 33W 10W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 480 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP54
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 165.6×76.2×8.2 mm
Weight 174 g 190 g
Launch price $139 $109

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

TCL 60R

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

TCL 60R

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

TCL 60R

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and TCL 60R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
TCL 60R MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100 -31.3%
528398 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads TCL 60R by 31.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

TCL 60R

$109

Launch price difference: $30. TCL 60R was $30 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60R (79/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the TCL 60R and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 60R (79/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 60R?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the TCL 60R by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 60R?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the TCL 60R — 43/100.

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 60R?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the TCL 60R?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.