Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi Note 4X
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi Note 4X (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625; launch prices were $139 and $160. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 22/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 218,879).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Redmi Note 4X
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 218879
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 862
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $160
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 14/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 74/100)
What makes Redmi Note 4X better?
- Lighter: 165g vs 174g
- Overall rating 22/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi Note 4X, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 28 points higher (50/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 14/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi Note 4X — 16/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (51/100 vs 14/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Redmi Note 4X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 218879 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 189 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 862 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 151.0×76.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 165 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $160 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Note 4X
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 4X
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 4X
- 4100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi Note 4X, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Redmi Note 4X by 217.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $21. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $21 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (51/100 vs 14/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (79/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 4X (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Note 4X?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 4X by 28 points (50/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi Note 4X?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi Note 4X — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Note 4X?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Note 4X?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 14/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi Note 4X?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.