Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $139 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 50/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 693,978); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 219g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $300
- Better portability (79/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 21 points higher (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (79/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 2726802 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 8932 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 74.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $161. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $161 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (89/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (79/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21 points (71/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.