Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi K90 Ultra
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $139 and $420. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 50/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,233,695 vs 693,978); the Redmi K90 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Redmi K90 Ultra
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $420
- Better portability (79/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3233695 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 8550 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi K90 Ultra, the Redmi K90 Ultra scores 23 points higher (73/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi K90 Ultra — 72/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (79/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Redmi K90 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3233695 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8550 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $420 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi K90 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 8550 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi K90 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 78.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $281. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $281 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (79/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 23 points (73/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi K90 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.