Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi Note 17 4G
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi Note 17 4G (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2; launch prices were $139 and $165. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 46/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 4G has the bigger battery (7700 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 505,682); the Redmi Note 17 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Redmi Note 17 4G
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 505682
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 484
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1558
- Lighter: 174g vs 224g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $165
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Redmi Note 17 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 7700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi Note 17 4G, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 4 points higher (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 4G leads (63/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi Note 17 4G — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi Note 17 4G are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 17 4G and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 4G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (79/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Redmi Note 17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 505682 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 484 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1558 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.0" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2396 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7700 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 169.7×79.1×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $165 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Note 17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2396
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 17 4G
- 7700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi Note 17 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Redmi Note 17 4G by 37.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $26. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $26 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (51/100 vs 36/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi Note 17 4G are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 17 4G and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 4G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 4G (79/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Note 17 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Redmi Note 17 4G by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi Note 17 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi Note 17 4G — 46/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi Note 17 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 36/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi Note 17 4G?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.