Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi 8A

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi 8A (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439; launch prices were $139 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 23/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 193,115); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is thinner (7.6mm vs 9.4mm).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A by 27 points (50/100 vs 23/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Redmi 8A

Performance 12
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money 34

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 193115
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 199
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 795
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 174g vs 188g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)

What makes Redmi 8A better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $139

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi 8A, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 27 points higher (50/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi 8A — 34/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 8A (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi 8A is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 8A (79/100 vs 52/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Redmi 8A
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
AnTuTu 693978 193115
Geekbench Single 1037 199
Geekbench Multi 2386 795
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.2" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W —
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 2GB / 3GB
Storage 128GB 32GB
OS Android 15 —
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no no
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 156.5×75.4×9.4 mm
Weight 174 g 188 g
Launch price $139 $100

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Redmi 8A

  • Main: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Redmi 8A

  • 6.2" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Redmi 8A

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi 8A, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
23/100 -259.4%
193115 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Redmi 8A by 259.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Redmi 8A

$100

Launch price difference: $39. Redmi 8A was $39 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A (51/100 vs 12/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A (79/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 8A (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi 8A is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 8A (79/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 8A?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 8A by 27 points (50/100 vs 23/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi 8A?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi 8A — 23/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 8A?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 8A?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 12/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi 8A?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.