Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi 17C

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi 17C (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra; launch prices were $139 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 32/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 17C has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 358,608); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 206g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Redmi 17C — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Redmi 17C

Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 10
Battery 46
Portability 53
Value for money 52

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Lighter: 174g vs 206g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 53/100)

What makes Redmi 17C better?

  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $139

  • Overall rating 32/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi 17C, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 18 points higher (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi 17C — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (79/100 vs 53/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Redmi 17C
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
AnTuTu 693978 358608
Geekbench Single 1037 432
Geekbench Multi 2386 1416
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 33W 18W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 600 nits
NFC no no
Protection IP64 IP64
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 171.6×79.5×8.2 mm
Weight 174 g 206 g
Launch price $139 $100

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Redmi 17C

  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Redmi 17C

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Redmi 17C

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi 17C, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Redmi 17C MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
32/100 -93.5%
358608 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Redmi 17C by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Redmi 17C

$100

Launch price difference: $39. Redmi 17C was $39 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (51/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (79/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 17C (79/100 vs 53/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 17C?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Redmi 17C — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi 17C?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi 17C — 32/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 17C?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 17C?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi 17C?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.