Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Redmi 14C
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Redmi 14C (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra; launch prices were $139 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 31/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 14C has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 358,608); the Redmi 14C has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Redmi 14C
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 204g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 13/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Redmi 14C better?
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $139
- Overall rating 31/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Redmi 14C, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 19 points higher (50/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 13/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Redmi 14C — 44/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (30/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (79/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Redmi 14C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 63 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $120 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi 14C
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 14C
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 14C
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Redmi 14C, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Redmi 14C by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $19. Redmi 14C was $19 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (51/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (79/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (30/100 vs 13/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (79/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 14C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Redmi 14C — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Redmi 14C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi 14C — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 14C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 13/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Redmi 14C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Redmi 14C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.