Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Oscal Flat 3C
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Oscal Flat 3C (2026) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T310; launch prices were $139 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 34/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 32 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Oscal Flat 3C
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 199g
- Better camera (30/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C better?
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $139
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Oscal Flat 3C, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 16 points higher (50/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Oscal Flat 3C — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (30/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Oscal Flat 3C is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Oscal Flat 3C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Unisoc Tiger T310 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 165.3×76.7×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $130 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Oscal Flat 3C
- Main: 32MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oscal Flat 3C
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oscal Flat 3C
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $9. Oscal Flat 3C was $9 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (79/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (30/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oscal Flat 3C is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Oscal Flat 3C — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Oscal Flat 3C — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 22/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.