Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Oscal Flat 3C Mini
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 16/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 153,667); the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 174g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 31/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 174g
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Oscal Flat 3C Mini, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 34 points higher (50/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (79/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (46/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 846 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 480x854 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 Go | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 158 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Oscal Flat 3C Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 351.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (51/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (79/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (46/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 34 points (50/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Oscal Flat 3C Mini?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.