Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Motorola Moto G Play 2026
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $139 and $150. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 40/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 32 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 528,398); the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 202g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Motorola Moto G Play 2026
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 32MP
- Lighter: 174g vs 202g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $150
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Moto G Play 2026 better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Motorola Moto G Play 2026, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 10 points higher (50/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 20/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Motorola Moto G Play 2026 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (30/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 (79/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Motorola Moto G Play 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 167.2×76.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 202 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $150 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Moto G Play 2026
- Main: 32MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G Play 2026
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G Play 2026
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Motorola Moto G Play 2026, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Motorola Moto G Play 2026 by 31.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $11. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $11 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 (79/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (30/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 (79/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Moto G Play 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Motorola Moto G Play 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Motorola Moto G Play 2026 — 40/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Moto G Play 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Moto G Play 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Motorola Moto G Play 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.