Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs Vivo Y32t
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 10/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (11/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 1 points higher (11/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) leads (11/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (11/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (76/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×9.0 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Main: 16MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (11/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (76/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) leads on camera score (11/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.