Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Note 60 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $300 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 65/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Note 60 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 996,010); the Infinix Note 60 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Infinix Note 60 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $300 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 996010
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1237
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3281
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 49/100)
Comparing the Infinix Note 60 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 4 points higher (69/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro leads (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro leads (72/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Pro (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Note 60 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (72/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 996010 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1237 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3281 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2700x1224 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.2×7.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $300 | $2899 |
Infinix Note 60 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Note 60 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2700x1224
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Note 60 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix Note 60 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Note 60 Pro by 66.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2599. Infinix Note 60 Pro is cheaper by $2599.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Pro (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Note 60 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (72/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Note 60 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Infinix Note 60 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Note 60 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Note 60 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Note 60 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.