Huawei P50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Huawei P50 Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1199 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4360); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,141,829); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 143); the Huawei P50 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei P50 Pro

Performance 64
Display 84
Camera 75
Battery 54
Portability 56
Value for money 44

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Huawei P50 Pro better?

  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g

  • Better portability (56/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1141829
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4360 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei P50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Huawei P50 Pro — 44/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (85/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Huawei P50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (56/100 vs 39/100).

Huawei P50 Pro: The Huawei P50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei P50 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1141829 4247433
Geekbench Single 1500 3639
Geekbench Multi 3537 11047
Display 6.6" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2700x1228 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4360 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 66W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 143 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 2.0 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 158.8×72.8×8.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Launch price $1199 $950

Camera comparison

Huawei P50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 13MP
75
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Huawei P50 Pro

  • 6.6" OLED
  • Resolution: 2700x1228
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Huawei P50 Pro

  • 4360 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
54
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei P50 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei P50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
67/100
1141829 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +73.1%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Huawei P50 Pro by 73.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei P50 Pro

$1199

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $249. Vivo X300 Ultra was $249 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (96/100 vs 75/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro (85/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Huawei P50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (56/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei P50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei P50 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Huawei P50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei P50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei P50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 75/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei P50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Huawei P50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei P50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.