Honor X9e Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor X9e Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 60/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X9e Pro has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,008,325); the Honor X9e Pro is thinner (8.1mm vs 12.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X9e Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor X9e Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1008325
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1099
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3481
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X9e Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 9 points higher (69/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X9e Pro leads (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X9e Pro (90/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X9e Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X9e Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X9e Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X9e Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1008325 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1099 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3481 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.2×77.0×8.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor X9e Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor X9e Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X9e Pro
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X9e Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor X9e Pro by 65.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor X9e Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X9e Pro (90/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X9e Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X9e Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X9e Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X9e Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor X9e Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X9e Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X9e Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X9e Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X9e Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Honor X9e Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X9e Pro is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.