Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade A52
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade A52 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 9/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A52 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade A52
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Overall rating 9/100
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade A52, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 21 points higher (30/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade A52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A52
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A52
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A52
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (51/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 by 21 points (30/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A52?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade A52 — 9/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade A52?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A52 is a better fit for everyday use.