Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade 20
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade 20 (2019) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 12/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade 20 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade 20 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade 20
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 5/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade 20, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 18 points higher (30/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 5/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade 20 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade 20 (27/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade 20 is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade 20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 779 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.9×76.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade 20
- Main: 16MP f/f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade 20
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade 20
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade 20 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade 20 (27/100 vs 5/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade 20 is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade 20 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade 20 — 12/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 5/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade 20 is a better fit for everyday use.