Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 23/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
- Faster charging: 66W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 185g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 7 points higher (30/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 840 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.6×75.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 185 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite — 23/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z9 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.