Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE AXON 50 5G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE AXON 50 5G (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 29/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE AXON 50 5G doesn't; the ZTE AXON 50 5G is noticeably lighter (178g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 31/100)
- Lighter: 178g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE AXON 50 5G, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 1 points higher (30/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE AXON 50 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc Tiger T760 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2380 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 161.9×72.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 178 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2380
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- 4800 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (77/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the ZTE AXON 50 5G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE AXON 50 5G — 29/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE AXON 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use.