Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (47/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (41/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for everyday use.