Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Avid 589
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 6/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Avid 589 doesn't; the ZTE Avid 589 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Avid 589
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 167g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (91/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 24 points higher (30/100 vs 6/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Avid 589 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 156818 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 723 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 167 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Avid 589
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Avid 589
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Avid 589
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (43/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (91/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 by 24 points (30/100 vs 6/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Avid 589?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 6/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Avid 589?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Avid 589 is a better fit for everyday use.