Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y200 (China)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y200 (China) (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y200 (China) leads — 32/100 vs 30/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 (China) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y200 (China) doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y200 (China)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Lighter: 187g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo Y200 (China), the Vivo Y200 (China) scores 2 points higher (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) leads (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y200 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y200 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 736675 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.4×74.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y200 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y200 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 (China)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y200 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (66/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y200 (China)?
The Vivo Y200 (China) edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y200 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y200 (China) — 32/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y200 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y200 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.